Housing and Transportation Setbacks
BY
TERRY MOAKLEY
ASSOCIATE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
PUBLIC AFFAIRS AND INFORMATION SERVICES
The New York
State Uniform Fire Prevention and Building Code Council on Nov. 8 voted,
with 11 in favor and four against, to require that just 10 percent of dwelling
units in newly constructed multi-family housing buildings be fully usable
for persons with disabilities. The remaining 90 percent of covered dwelling
units in new housing buildings would be "visitable," (i.e., persons with
disabilities could reach such dwelling units and enter them along an accessible
route of travel, but they would be unable to live in them without undertaking
costly renovations, at least in EPVA's opinion).
In the view
of the Department of State's Codes Division, which administers the state
code and is in the process of adopting a new model code, the 10 percent
figure was recommended, and obviously adopted, in response to the more
than 80 comments received from individuals and groups of the disabled during
a summer-long public comment period.
The original
proposal, which is included in the model code, is just two percent usable
units. On the other hand, EPVA maintains that the 10 percent figure is
a reduction of 90 percent when compared to the current building code, which
calls for 100 percent accessible and adaptable dwelling units in new buildings
with elevators, and accessible and adaptable ground floor units in buildings
without elevators.
Prior to the
vote on the 10 percent usable units, as a member of the Council, I offered
a substitute motion to improve the design specifications in two areas of
the 90 percent visitable units: require at least one usable bathroom in
such dwelling units, and sufficient maneuvering clearance at interior doors
to rooms. I believe that this motion would remove the need for persons
with disabilities to make expensive structural changes such as reconfiguring
a bathroom and widening doorways. It would transform visitable units to
usable units, at little cost to builders. While only two council members
spoke against my motion, it was defeated by a vote of seven to eight.
These new
provisions are scheduled to become effective in late Spring or early Summer
of 2002. EPVA will continue the struggle on many fronts to achieve multi-family
housing in the future which can be used by all persons.
On another
similarly frustrating front, Oct. 31, 2001 has come and gone, and there
is no enforcement yet of a New York City Taxi and Limousine Commission
(TLC) regulation, supposedly effective after that date, which requires
for-hire vehicle companies (car services and black cars) to provide comparable
wheelchair accessible service upon request. The TLC has decided to "delay
enforcement" of this regulation while it surveys companies in this business
to determine how they plan to comply with these requirements.
Why? At the
same time this rule was unveiled in February of this year, the TLC also
announced a "conversion reimbursement fund" of $1 million -- $750,000 of
which was earmarked for the car service/black car industry. Without boring
New York Able readers with too many details about this fund, let's just
state that companies that elected to buy a van or minivan, and then convert
it to a wheelchair accessible van or minivan, could be reimbursed up to
$7,500 per vehicle of the cost to make the conversion. Sounds like a pretty
good deal, no?
Apparently
not. TLC sources informed us that "just a few" conversion reimbursement
fund applications have been submitted to them. This industry had eight
and one-half months to comply with this regulation, plus a pot of money
to recover some of their costs, and still they did nothing. By delaying
enforcement, the TLC tacitly approves their unacceptable behavior. Once
again, we witness a government agency that does not take the needs of New
York City's disability community seriously. The TLC needs to begin enforcing
this regulation now, perhaps through a monthly system of fines which gradually
increase until compliance is demonstrated.
|